To: "SAVI Mailing List" <savi at ietf.org> Cc: "Bill Fenner" <fenner at fenron.com> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 3:04 PM Subject: [savi] Consensus call on separate documents for DHCP and SLAAC
Dear all - The SAVI working group has so far taken the approach to specify the validation of DHCP-assigned IP source addresses and SLAAC-assigned IP source addresses in a single document. However, arguments have been made, and were discussed at the SAVI meeting in Stockholm, that a better approach would be to specify the two types of validation in separate documents, and to produce a framework document that describes the relationship between, and common principles of, the various IP address validation types. The bottom-line of these arguments is that the separation would be (a) justifiable and recommendable due to enough differences between the validation of DHCP-assigned and SLAAC-assigned IP source addresses, (b) in line with the working group's approach to also use separate documents for the validation of SEND-assigned IP source addresses, and IP source address validation in broadband access networks. This is a consensus call on whether the SAVI working group should change its approach towards producing separate documents for the validation of DHCP-assigned IP source addresses and SLAAC-assigned IP source addresses, plus a framework document. Please answer either "yes" or "no" to the following question: Should the SAVI working group produce separate documents for DHCP- assigned IP source addresses and SLAAC-assigned IP source addresses,plus a framework document that describes the relationship between, andcommon principles of, the various IP address validation types?
Frank=>Yes.
Please respond by Sunday, September 13, 2009. - Christian _______________________________________________ savi mailing list savi at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.