Re: [savi] Consensus call on separate documents for DHCP and SLAAC

[Dong Zhang <zhangdong_rh at huaweisymantec.com>]

Hi,

Christian Vogt 2009-09-06 Wrote:
>Dear all -
>
>The SAVI working group has so far taken the approach to specify the
>validation of DHCP-assigned IP source addresses and SLAAC-assigned IP
>source addresses in a single document.  However, arguments have been
>made, and were discussed at the SAVI meeting in Stockholm, that a better
>approach would be to specify the two types of validation in separate
>documents, and to produce a framework document that describes the
>relationship between, and common principles of, the various IP address
>validation types.  The bottom-line of these arguments is that the
>separation would be
>
>(a) justifiable and recommendable due to enough differences between the
>     validation of DHCP-assigned and SLAAC-assigned IP source addresses,
>
>(b) in line with the working group's approach to also use separate
>     documents for the validation of SEND-assigned IP source addresses,
>     and IP source address validation in broadband access networks.
>
>This is a consensus call on whether the SAVI working group should change
>its approach towards producing separate documents for the validation of
>DHCP-assigned IP source addresses and SLAAC-assigned IP source
>addresses, plus a framework document.  Please answer either "yes" or
>"no" to the following question:
>
>   Should the SAVI working group produce separate documents for DHCP-
>   assigned IP source addresses and SLAAC-assigned IP source addresses,
>   plus a framework document that describes the relationship between,  
>and
>   common principles of, the various IP address validation types?
Yes.

>
>Please respond by Sunday, September 13, 2009.
>
>- Christian
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>savi mailing list
>savi at ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi


------------------				 
Dong Zhang
2009-09-14