[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [savi] A few comments on draft-vogt-savi-framework



Dong -

Your recollection is correct; the Framework document should and will
include the properties of, and the relationship between, the various IP
address assignment methods.  Section 3.1 in the current Framework
document version is a placeholder for this.  Text for this section is
still to be added, as noted in the document.  And yes, this text shall
cover not only SLAAC and DHCP, but also SEND and manual IP address
configuration.

- Christian



On Oct 22, 2009, Dong Zhang wrote:

Hi Christian,

I remember that the framework document would inlcude the relationship
between DHCP-assigned IP source addresses and SLAAC-assigned IP source
addresses  according to the discussion in ml, but it seems that the
description about the  relationship is not quit clear in
draft-vogt-savi-framework. Therefore, I suppose the framework document
should has an introduction for the components of  savi protocol
instances and include in what case which savi protocol instance is used
better.

Nowthat there is the possibility of co-existence of multiple protocol
instances, the interoperability needs to be considered. Is it possible
to set priority for  the savi protocol instances according to some
qualifications? If so, it  facilitates choosing the savi protocol
instance which is more reliable and  effective.

Additionally, in section "IP Address Assignment Methods", I think it
could  comprises these types: static address, dhcp address, SLAAC
address, CGA address  and manual address.


Thank you. B.R.



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.