On Oct 28, 2009, Dong Zhang wrote: > My concern is that as a vendor, it may implement the savi approaches, > including fcfs approach, cps approach and SEND approach. So how to > coordinate them needs to be considered. I mean all the approaches work > together or choose one to work. I guess it could be the latter. If so, > the condition for choosing each approach should be illustrated > unambiguously. Yes, I agree. > However, I assumed that there is still an exception, which means > several address assignment methods exist in one case. How do the savi > approaches deal with this case? For this case, we need a prioritization of which address assignment methods take precedence over which other address assignment methods. And you are right that the definition of this prioritization will require care. Does this make sense? Does it address your question and comment? - Christian
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.