[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [savi] A few comments on draft-vogt-savi-framework



Christian Vogt 2009-10-29 Wrote:
>On Oct 28, 2009, Dong Zhang wrote:
>
>> My concern is that as a vendor, it may implement the savi approaches,
>> including fcfs approach, cps approach and SEND approach. So how to
>> coordinate them needs to be considered. I mean all the approaches work
>> together or choose one to work. I guess it could be the latter. If so,
>> the condition for choosing  each approach should be illustrated
>> unambiguously.
>
>Yes, I agree.
>
>> However, I assumed that there is still an exception, which means
>> several  address assignment methods exist in one case. How do the savi
>> approaches deal  with this case?
>
>For this case, we need a prioritization of which address assignment
>methods take precedence over which other address assignment methods.
>And you are right that the definition of this prioritization will
>require care.
>
>Does this make sense?  Does it address your question and comment?
Yes, it makes sense.
Thanks.
>
>- Christian


------------------				 
Dong Zhang
2009-10-29


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.