Hi Christian I am fine with adopting this document as a WG draft. However, this draft, imho, is limited when applying for public access networks, especially broadband networks. I would like to ask WG to consider to adopt DHCP-PD based solution as a compliment. http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kaippallimalil-savi-dhcp-pd-00.txt BR Frank----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian Vogt" <christian.vogt at ericsson.com>
To: "SAVI Mailing List" <savi at ietf.org> Cc: "Guang Yao" <yaoa02 at mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 4:44 AM Subject: [savi] Consensus call on adopting draft-bi-savi-dhcp-00 Folks - During the SAVI working group meeting today, we made a consensus check about adopting Internet draft "draft-bi-savi-dhcp-00" as a working group document, showing a clear majority of attendees in favor. I would now like to initiate a confirming consensus call here on the mailing list. Please answer the following question with either "yes" or "no": Should the SAVI working group adopt Internet draft "draft-bi-savi-dhcp-00" as a starting point for the SAVI protocol specification for DHCP-assigned IP addresses? Please respond before Friday, November 20. I am attaching Internet draft "draft-bi-savi-dhcp-00" for your convenience. - Christian --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ savi mailing list savi at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.