[scim] Porposed charter

"Morteza Ansari (moransar)" <moransar@cisco.com> Thu, 09 February 2012 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <moransar@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C34E11E80A1 for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 19:33:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9EvZj8uwtmHq for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 19:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D45A11E8098 for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 19:33:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=moransar@cisco.com; l=24047; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1328758385; x=1329967985; h=mime-version:subject:date:message-id:from:to; bh=M4GRmNdJKYes7BvEabV1uLr1HGN35cmYGny2hpR6LJ4=; b=kO6cBeDae4ZrOUvnCIjplDHQ28t9qwMAyIKzWiSJCguyWt0TF2OTEqE1 oir40WmLQR3lyg5CP6gv0TXtbCby8vR+qGeMXiylZljTLN1MDbAA6G05O IKSac0SmE0QaVGELXBXVlZCZos57cf4H4gZR+t1L3oxofhqqaEzquPuV9 M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAJo9M0+tJV2Y/2dsb2JhbAA6CYJNrFOBB4F0AQQBAQEPAQkRAz4dASoCBBAIByYxAQQTCAEZh2OZHIEnAZ5TiGuCUgQZDgQCAwUKATyEYAEFCoJWYwSIRp9j
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.73,387,1325462400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="57487011"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2012 03:32:59 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com [72.163.63.9]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q193WxUv021908 for <scim@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 03:32:59 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-313.cisco.com ([72.163.63.28]) by xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 8 Feb 2012 21:32:59 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CCE6DB.854DDC6A"
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:32:58 -0600
Message-ID: <93C6FB63F046384C86EC8F7F3FFEC7BEA723CB@XMB-RCD-313.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Porposed charter
Thread-Index: AczmzBHGeogmTjP9SHiNgabjIRt73Q==
From: "Morteza Ansari (moransar)" <moransar@cisco.com>
To: scim@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2012 03:32:59.0410 (UTC) FILETIME=[8536F720:01CCE6DB]
Subject: [scim] Porposed charter
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:33:11 -0000

Hi folks,

 

Here is the proposed charter as we discussed over the cloud-directory
mailing list. Please review and send your comments.

 

 

Cheers,

Morteza

 

 

Simplified Cloud Identity Management (SCIM)

--------------------------------------------------------

 

Charter

 

Current Status: BOF Request

 

Chair(s):

     TBD1

     TBD2

 

Applications Area Director(s):

     Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> 

     Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>

 

Mailing Lists:

     General Discussion: scim@ietf.org

     To Subscribe:     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim

     Archive:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim/current/maillist.html

 

Description of Working Group:

 

The Simple Cloud Identity Management (SCIM) specification is designed to
make managing user identity lifecycle in cloud based applications and
services easier.

 

The specification suite seeks to build upon experience with existing
schemas and deployments, placing specific emphasis on simplicity of
development and integration, while applying existing authentication,
authorization, and privacy models. Its intent is to reduce the cost and
complexity of user management operations by providing a common user
schema and extension model, as well as binding documents to provide
patterns for exchanging this schema using standard protocols.

 

The group will work to adapt the SCIM 1.0 specification produced under
the Open Web Foundation framework (http://www.simplecloud.info) as an
IETF technology for management of user identities in cloud-based
applications.

 

SCIM 1.0 consists of:

*         Schema definition for identity related objects

*         Protocol definition for accessing and managing the identity
objects

*         Binding of SCIM schema to Security Assertion Markup Language
(SAML) messages and assertions

*         Binding of SCIM schema to Lightweight Directory Access
Protocol (LDAP) schema (RFC4519)

 

The Working Group will produce one or more documents suitable for
consideration as a Proposed Standard that will:

*         Improve the terminology used

*         Embody good security practices, document gaps in its
capabilities, and propose a path forward for addressing the gaps

*         Promote interoperability

*         Provide guidelines for extensibility

 

SCIM 1.0 will be used as the starting point. The working group will
strive to retain backward compatibility with the 1.0 specification.
Changes that are not backwards compatible may be accepted if the group
determines changes are required to meet the group's technical objectives
and the group clearly documents the reasons for making them.

 

The Working Group should consider:

*         Implementer experience

*         The end-user experience, including internationalization

*         Existing uses of SCIM

*         Ability to achieve broad implementation

*         Ability to address broader use cases than those considered by
the original authors

*         Additional functions or extensions that are needed to address
key security concerns, cross-area review, and implementer feedback

 

The working group will focus on adapting the core technology first but
work on extensions will be considered after the core work is well in
hand.