[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]

In particular, as I mentioned in my previous email to Behcet,
independence
from mobility protocol was considered a first priority requirement,
because
this has been a foundational principle of all Seamoby work. In addition,
we
did not want the protocol to be encumbered by or dependent upon the
process of another working group, as this would set up a dependence
between our work and the work of another working group that could
result in delays. Finally, requirements originating out of the problem
statement
had higher priority than other requirements. So, for example, the
requirement of indepenence of paging area from subnet topology
was identified in the problem statement and therefore had higher
priority. These requirements are ones that we believe will give IP
paging
an advantage over current practice, and therefore are likely to serve as
an
incentive for implementation and deployment.

> And the second thing is that the comments that were posted by some of
> the authors of the candidate protocols before the SLC meeting should
> also be reflected to the assessment draft, if those comments are
> relevant.
>

The assessment is meant to be a record of the assessment team
deliberations
and not a complete transcript of the working group's dialog on the
process.
The comments posted by the authors are part of the mailing list archive.

However, I should probably remove the sentence in the abstract that says
the assessment draft will make a recommendation, since it doesn't.

Thank you for posting this. It is very important that the decision
making process
be transparent, and I agree that the WG chairs have not done a very good
job of explaining it. I hope this makes things clearer.


                jak




_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
&amp;lt;A HREF=&amp;quot;&lt;a  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;<a  rel="nofollow" href="https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby&amp;quot&quot";>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby&amp;quot&quot</a>;&gt;<a  rel="nofollow" href="https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby&amp;quot";>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby&amp;quot</a>&lt;/a&gt;;&amp;gt;&lt;a  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;<a  rel="nofollow" href="https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby&quot";>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby&quot</a>;&gt;<a  rel="nofollow" href="https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby";>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby</a>&lt;/a&gt;&amp;lt;/A&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/PRE&amp;gt;

&amp;lt;!--X-Body-of-Message-End--&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;!--X-MsgBody-End--&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;!--X-Follow-Ups--&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;hr&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Follow-Ups&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;:
&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a name=&amp;quot;00052&amp;quot; href=&amp;quot;msg00052.html&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Re: [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol assessment draft&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;em&amp;gt;From:&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; Yoshihiro Ohba &amp;amp;lt;yohba@tari.toshiba.com&amp;amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;!--X-Follow-Ups-End--&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;!--X-References--&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;References&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;:
&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a name=&amp;quot;00034&amp;quot; href=&amp;quot;msg00034.html&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol assessment draft&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;em&amp;gt;From:&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; Yoshihiro Ohba &amp;amp;lt;yohba@tari.toshiba.com&amp;amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;!--X-References-End--&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;!--X-BotPNI--&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Prev by Date:
&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;msg00048.html&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Re: [Seamoby] framework for DMHA protocol&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Next by Date:
&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;msg00050.html&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Re: [Seamoby] proposal on next steps in paging&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Previous by thread:
&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;msg00034.html&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol assessment draft&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Next by thread:
&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;msg00052.html&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Re: [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol assessment draft&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Index(es):
&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;mail77.html#00049&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Date&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;thrd76.html#00049&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Thread&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;

&amp;lt;!--X-BotPNI-End--&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;!--X-User-Footer--&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;!--X-User-Footer-End--&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/body&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/html&amp;gt;
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;!--X-Body-of-Message-End--&gt;
&lt;!--X-MsgBody-End--&gt;
&lt;!--X-Follow-Ups--&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;!--X-Follow-Ups-End--&gt;
&lt;!--X-References--&gt;
&lt;!--X-References-End--&gt;
&lt;!--X-BotPNI--&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prev by Date:
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;msg00048.html&quot;&gt;[no subject]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Next by Date:
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;msg00050.html&quot;&gt;[no subject]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Previous by thread:
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;msg00048.html&quot;&gt;[no subject]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Next by thread:
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;msg00050.html&quot;&gt;[no subject]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Index(es):
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;maillist.html#00049&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;threads.html#00049&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thread&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;!--X-BotPNI-End--&gt;
&lt;!--X-User-Footer--&gt;
&lt;!--X-User-Footer-End--&gt;
&lt;/body&gt;
&lt;/html&gt;
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00048.html">[no subject]</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00050.html">[no subject]</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00048.html">[no subject]</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00050.html">[no subject]</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00049"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00049"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>