[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]



> I was going over the CARD protocol, mainly with the piggybacking of
> CARD Options using the FMIPv6 proxy messages. For piggybacking
> to work, the Type value for CARD Request and CARD Reply Must Not
> collide with the "Option-Type" assignments in FMIPv6. Currently, there
> are only 3 values assigned in FMIPv6.
> The "Seamoby IANA Allocations" draft leaves CARD Request and Reply
> with TBD9 and TBD10. I think we should request them to assign
> 9, 10 or some higher number like that. We do not need to co-ordinate the
> Sub-options assignments.
>

Since the CARD ICMP options and the FMIP options are being assigned out of
the same ICMP option numbering space, there should be no need to request any
particular assignment from IANA. They will co-ordinate such that there is no
clash between the two. Off the top of my head, I can't think why any
particular numbers for CARD should be preferred to any others, but if
there's something I'm missing, we can send a special request to IANA for
particular numbers.


> Also, why not send a RtSolPr with the CARD Request Option and
> Sub-options and see if the router replies, instead of using a probing
> mechanism to discover "piggybacking". I know this is too late, but
> a thought nevertheless.
>

I'd prefer not to change the draft at this point. As of this weekend, we
have agreement from Alex Zinn to remove his Discuss and Allison is ready to
send it to the draft to the RFC Editor for publication as soon as we submit
version 8.

Let's move further discussion of improvements to MOBOPTS.

            jak



_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby at ietf.org
<a  href="https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby";>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby</a>



</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="02786" href="msg02786.html">Re: [Seamoby] Candidate 2 for Draft 8 for CARD</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Rajeev Koodli</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="02780" href="msg02780.html">[Seamoby] Candidate 2 for Draft 8 for CARD</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> James Kempf</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="02781" href="msg02781.html">Re: [Seamoby] Candidate 2 for Draft 8 for CARD</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Rajeev Koodli</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg02784.html">[Seamoby] TVoDSL 2005 Conference - Paris</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg02786.html">Re: [Seamoby] Candidate 2 for Draft 8 for CARD</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg02783.html">Re: [Seamoby] Candidate 2 for Draft 8 for CARD</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg02786.html">Re: [Seamoby] Candidate 2 for Draft 8 for CARD</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#02785"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#02785"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>