[secdir] SECDIR review of draft-eronen-enterprise-number-documentation-01.txt
canetti <canetti@post.tau.ac.il> Tue, 09 June 2009 06:19 UTC
Return-Path: <secdir-bounces@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971583A6C36 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HHQvxTzorE69 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pch.mit.edu (PCH.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.90]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974593A6B81 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pch.mit.edu (pch.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]) by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n596JPdi015586 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:19:25 -0400
Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu (FORT-POINT-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.76]) by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n596JN09015574 for <secdir@PCH.mit.edu>; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:19:23 -0400
Received: from mit.edu (W92-130-BARRACUDA-3.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.224]) by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id n596JGXr003157 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:19:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from doar.tau.ac.il (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mit.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 498237F16FF for <secdir@mit.edu>; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:19:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from doar.tau.ac.il (gate.tau.ac.il [132.66.16.26]) by mit.edu with ESMTP id vyEzLvNcX5i8n4B2 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:19:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received-SPF: pass (mit.edu: domain of canetti@post.tau.ac.il designates 132.66.16.26 as permitted sender) receiver=mit.edu; client_ip=132.66.16.26; envelope-from=canetti@post.tau.ac.il;
Received: from [10.0.0.5] (bzq-79-182-104-115.red.bezeqint.net [79.182.104.115]) by doar.tau.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0665FBEFB; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:19:13 +0300 (IDT)
Message-ID: <4A2DFEDF.2030202@post.tau.ac.il>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:19:11 +0300
From: canetti <canetti@post.tau.ac.il>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: secdir@mit.edu, pasi.eronen@nokia.com
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
X-BeenThere: secdir@mit.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: secdir-bounces@mit.edu
Errors-To: secdir-bounces@mit.edu
Subject: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-eronen-enterprise-number-documentation-01.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:19:22 -0000
*** I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's *** ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the *** IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the *** security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat *** these comments just like any other last call comments. The draft describes a specific vendor number (32473) to be used in documentation and examples. I see no security issues here. Best, Ran _______________________________________________ secdir mailing list secdir@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/secdir