[secdir] review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-05.txt
Radia Perlman <Radia.Perlman@sun.com> Thu, 27 August 2009 00:49 UTC
Return-Path: <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2215D3A6BD0; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bS6X8viBBB4Y; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mta.sunlabs.com (edge.sunlabs.com [204.153.12.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832E63A6A6B; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sunlabs.com ([152.70.2.186]) by mail-mta.sfvic.sunlabs.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.02 (built Aug 25 2004)) with ESMTP id <0KP000L0RFMBQC00@mail-mta.sfvic.sunlabs.com>; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.29.100] ([96.240.113.234]) by mail.sunlabs.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.02 (built Aug 25 2004)) with ESMTPSA id <0KP000FEQFM9XDK1@mail.sunlabs.com>; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:49:22 -0700
From: Radia Perlman <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, stbryant@cisco.com, mshand@cisco.com
Message-id: <4A95D812.8000304@sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
Subject: [secdir] review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-05.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:49:23 -0000
This is a "framework" document about various types of solutions for "microloops", which are temporary loops while a topology is stabilizing. I discussed my issues already with the authors, and other than two edits which they've agreed to, no problems. The two edits a) put in a definition of "microloop" b) rewrite the security considerations section, which is basically saying that this document is not actually proposing specific solutions, but instead is talking about the range of solutions that have been proposed, and that being specific about the security considerations of a solution would be done in the separate document that specifies the specifics of that solution. Radia
- [secdir] review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk… Radia Perlman