[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02
Magnus Nyström <magnusn@gmail.com> Thu, 25 August 2011 06:08 UTC
Return-Path: <magnusn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D059721F8AB8; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fD-ER5epyoNj; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E65021F855B; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so1740853gxk.31 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uby91FOKoUIWQZUDi5PVigVhj0DRXB+nZh/2J5LUoOw=; b=TOjO13ZtSV/G6xSJF6bqc12tUoo3phG0RFy4XF+PI2HMC+kxdWUGUztgBY+4dwI1KC C7hqh8fmXNrDCTf/ujHOawv19HC9BSUg1sBYhFOS6oiugDFSWuVjsGPbdUnVbownaBQY uzVUEiFbidoxXpQqJYlKh4YKnoZXFIjgz1Xd0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.254.5 with SMTP id b5mr457475ybi.240.1314252564873; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.96.19 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:09:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CADajj4ZJ_5qoBxPsUY6xWL4Tf_d_QgwP0Ooj2=x31LuDwC4ceA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Magnus Nyström <magnusn@gmail.com>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:08:13 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document updates RFC 4409 by clarifying MSA/MTA/MUA behavior and providing further guidance. The security considerations section seems relevant and I have no other comments on this document. -- Magnus
- [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409b… Magnus Nyström