On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:42:55AM -0400, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: > No, I think the right thing is for the SSH_MSG_OPTION message itself to be > permitted at any time, and leave it to the definitions of individual > options to specify when an option may be negotiated and when the results of > that negotiation take effect. > > [...] > > With regard to the negotiation itself, I think it might be cleaner to have > three separate messages: Surely you jest. Why get so complicated when the much simpler negotiation through alg names will do? What value is there in this complication?
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.