Peter Gutmann <pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz> writes: > The reason why the second interpretation could be argued to be useful is if > you see the exchange as: > > Client: I propose a max.packet size of 128 MB. > Server: That looks a bit large to me, how about 64kB? But the server can lower the value however it likes, without telling the client. Like Client: I can accept packets of size up to 128 MB. Server: That's too high for my taste. I'll just pretend that the client said only 64kB. You might argue that it would be useful for the client to know that this server has decided to not send any packets larger than 64kB, but I'd say that really getting any advantage out of that information is too much complexity for too small gain. (And same goes with the roles of client and server reversed, of course). Regards, /Niels
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.