secsh Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Mailing List Directory]
[secsh List Information]
- Validate and Update your mailbox,
Bea Martin
- Last Call: <draft-dbider-sha2-mac-for-ssh-05.txt> (SHA-2 Data Integrity Verification for the Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol) to Proposed Standard,
The IESG
- FYI: Document writeup for draft-dbider-sha2-mac-for-ssh-03,
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- The deadline for tax return filing has expired #89245086,
Joshua Price
- upgrading our database.,
IT Services
- [Fwd: Re: draft-dbider-sha2-mac-for-ssh-03],
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Keeping Track Of Your Usage,
Groft, Stephen (NIH/NCATS) [E]
- Brief,
Elena
- Re: ssh-keygen -r should support SSHFP records for ECDSA (or at least return non-zero error code on failure),
Mark D. Baushke
- fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dbider-sha2-mac-for-ssh-04.txt,
Mark D. Baushke
- draft-dbider-sha2-mac-for-ssh-02 for IETF 82 in Taipei ?,
Mark D. Baushke
- Making love toys bigger-harder,
nautica . n03
- Re: [saag] Support for ECDSA and SHA-2 (SHA-256) in the SSHFP record,
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Fwd: Support for ECDSA and SHA-2 (SHA-256) in the SSHFP record,
OndÅej SurÃ
- SecureComm2011 - Call for Posters,
pramod.s.pawar
- Your Mailbox expires in 24 hours,
Campbell, Kim
- Mail Quota Exceeded,
Mail Administrator
- draft-kwatsen-reverse-ssh-01 submission for review,
Kent Watsen
- Re: [saag] draft-kwatsen-reverse-ssh-01 submission for review,
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- [no subject],
xoranon
- draft-kwatsen-reverse-ssh submission for review,
Kent Watsen
I-D Action:draft-kwatsen-reverse-ssh-00.txt (fwd),
Chris Lonvick
SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Joseph Galbraith
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Mark D. Baushke
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
denis bider \(Bitvise\)
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Mark D. Baushke
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
denis bider
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Mark D. Baushke
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
denis bider \(Bitvise\)
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Simon Tatham
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
denis bider \(Bitvise\)
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
denis bider \(Bitvise\)
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Damien Miller
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Niels Möller
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Niels Möller
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Dan Brown
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Niels Möller
- RE: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Dan Brown
- RE: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Dan Brown
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Peter Gutmann
- RE: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Dan Brown
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
denis bider
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
denis bider \(Bitvise\)
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Niels Möller
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
denis bider
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Niels Möller
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...,
Peter Gutmann
MOST URGENT FROM IRAQ.,
Harris, Larry
upgrade your account,
Webmail Upgrade Team
Server authentication using X.509v3 certificates,
Douglas Stebila
Extension of the agent protocol for the PKCS#11 URI scheme,
Jan Pechanec
SSH Port Forwarding,
Michael Perrier
RSA PSS in SSH?,
Hanno BÃck
CONFIRM YOUR EMAIL IDENTITY BELOW,
Web Support Team
"too many auth failures"?,
der Mouse
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Simon Josefsson
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Love Hörnquist Åstrand
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
der Mouse
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
der Mouse
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Niels Möller
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Niels Möller
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
der Mouse
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
der Mouse
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
der Mouse
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
Joseph Galbraith
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
James Cloos
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "too many auth failures"?,
James Blaisdell
Dear E-mail User,
Email Support Team
draft-igoe-secsh-x509v3-06.txt,
Jeffrey Hutzelman
Upgrade Your Email Account,
Webmail
Healthcare Lists, Business Lists, Consumer Lists, Professional Lists and more,
comport Schulz
SSH domain name misdirection,
Haines Brown KB1GRM ET1
fd forwarding, take 2,
der Mouse
fds beyond 0/1/2,
der Mouse
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Niels Möller
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
der Mouse
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Simon Tatham
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
der Mouse
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Simon Tatham
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
der Mouse
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Niels Möller
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
der Mouse
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
der Mouse
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
der Mouse
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
der Mouse
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Niels Möller
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
der Mouse
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Damien Miller
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
der Mouse
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
Damien Miller
- Re: fds beyond 0/1/2,
der Mouse
New draft of X.509v3 Certificates for Secure Shell Authentication,
Douglas Stebila
f gover,
Blonsky Manzanero
Your Assurance in this matter,
Liu Tai Ling
Dentists mailing lists,
Arias checkout
Call for Review on draft-kanno-secsh-camellia-00,
Satoru Kanno
Önnek is kettö van,
Kovács
Good Day,
Liu Tai Ling
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Good Day,
Mr Ling Tia
Dear Web-Mail Account Owner,
Web-Mail Admin
I need your Swiftly reply,
Mike kevin
3rd CfP: ICWMC 2010 || September 20-25, 2010 - Valencia, Spain,
ICWMC 2010
Good Day, Reply to: liutai_ling12 at yahoo.com.hk,
Sharon Johnson
tunneling and exec channel request support for SSH URIs,
Jim Wigginton
Still more feedback on draft-igoe-secsh-x509v3-01,
Joseph Galbraith
More feedback on draft-igoe-secsh-x509v3-01,
Joseph Galbraith
Feedback on draft-igoe-secsh-x509v3-01,
Joseph Galbraith
OpenSSH certified keys,
Damien Miller
Dear Web-Mail Account Owner,
Web-Mail Admin
Progress on draft-igoe-secsh-x509v3?,
Chris Lonvick
New Version Notification for draft-igoe-secsh-x509v3-01,
Douglas Stebila
Warning Code: ID67565434,
Triton College Web Mail Service
Attn. Web-Mail User,
WEB-MAIL ADMIN
Dear Webmail/E-mail user,
Administrator
Webmail Account Owner (Warning Code :ID67565434),
WEB-MAIL ADMIN
draft-igoe-secsh-x509v3-00,
Igoe, Kevin M.
Security Alart,
WEB ADMIN
TERMINATION OF YOUR INTELVISION.NET WEBMAIL ACCOUNT,
Intelvision High-Speed Internet Service
failure notice,
MAILER-DAEMON
Feedback from uri list,
Steve Suehring
SSH URI Draft,
Steve Suehring
URI Draft,
Steve Suehring
Winner <Reply: motorolaprom128 at yahoo.com.hk>Winner <Reply: motorolaprom128 at yahoo.com.hk>,
Leslie Roberts
Re: SSH non-compliance with FIPS 186,
Niels Möller
maximum size of packets from client to server,
Thomas Anderson
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
der Mouse
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
Thomas Anderson
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
der Mouse
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
der Mouse
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
Niels Möller
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
der Mouse
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
Niels Möller
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
denis bider \(Bitvise\)
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
denis bider \(Bitvise\)
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
der Mouse
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
denis bider \(Bitvise\)
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
Joseph Galbraith
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
Thomas Anderson
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
Thomas Anderson
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
Thomas Anderson
- Re: maximum size of packets from client to server,
Thomas Anderson
Concerns about individual submissions process (c.f. RFC5647 AES-GCM for Secure Shell),
Nicolas Williams
[no subject],
MATSUI Yuichi SystemsDesignWorks inc
should "want reply" responses be checked or ignored?,
Jim Wigginton
Winner,
Motorola Company
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Winner,
Motorola Company
OurRef: FGN /SNT/STB,
Senate House
drava,
vocable
sftp open directory,
Andriy Melnyk
Re: drasft-green--secsh-ecc-08 support for certificates,
Douglas Stebila
ssh1 doc?,
der Mouse
deaft-gree-sedsh-ecc-08: small correction,
Igoe, Kevin M.
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-green-secsh-ecc-07,
Douglas Stebila
Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak" (fwd),
David McGrew
adja s ne hagyja,
Mark Rozsahegyi
New version: draft-green-secsh-ecc-06,
Douglas Stebila
applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Tim Polk
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Peter Gutmann
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Peter Gutmann
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Peter Gutmann
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Peter Gutmann
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Damien Miller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Peter Gutmann
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Damien Miller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Simon Tatham
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Peter Gutmann
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Peter Gutmann
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Joseph Galbraith
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Moving forward with draft-igoe (Was: Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak"),
Tim Polk
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Joseph Galbraith
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Tero Kivinen
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Damien Miller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Timo J. Rinne
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Damien Miller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Niels Möller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Niels Möller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Niels Möller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Niels Möller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Damien Miller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Peter Gutmann
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Damien Miller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Peter Gutmann
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Peter Gutmann
- Compression [was Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak"],
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Damien Miller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Niels Möller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
denis bider \(Bitvise\)
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Niels Möller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Peter Gutmann
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Niels Möller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Damien Miller
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Nicolas Williams
- SSH_MSG_KEXINIT extensions field [was Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak"],
der Mouse
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Peter Gutmann
- Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak",
Damien Miller
Mail converted by MHonArc
