Re: [sidr] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sidr-arch-06.txt

[Robert Kisteleki <robert at ripe.net>]

Terry Manderson wrote:
[...]
> Additionally, the structure proposed implies to me that the ERX block 
> would go back to the originated RIR if relinquished (handed back) by the 
> holder. I'm not clear that this is the case. Last time I traversed the 
> policy on this I thought the resource remained with the _current_ RIR 
> for reallocation. (but could be wrong - I couldn't find anything in the 
> ERX faqs @ the RIR websites to confirm/deny)

AFAIK there is no policy for this yet. There may be one soon.

Robert