![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Given the contentiousness of this topic and the importance and architectural implications therein, I maintain my position that process needs to be followed here. Something that you or the chairs believe is trivial may well be of considerable concern to others more or less informed.
And in fairness and for sake of transparency, to illustrate my point:<http://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence/2008-12-04-huston-TAs-IANA-RIRs.html >
-danny