Re: [sidr] Subject names wrt sidr-ta, sidr-arch

[Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>]

> For meaningful names:
> 	Directly identifies the resource holder to any third party

actually not.  note that, due to trademark rules
   Randy's Inviting but Peculiar Epicurian
can have the trade name RIPE which does not conflict with the one
on singelstraat

> So, in this light I would urge the authors to remove all requirements  
> for ANY RPKI certs to be named, including the higher order RPKI certs.

this change in the document certainly did not seem to have consensus in
the meeting, though sandy would be the one to judge that.

> This leads me to the sidr-ta draft.

wear a nose plug

randy