Re: [sidr] Subject names wrt sidr-ta, sidr-arch

[Terry Manderson <terry at terrym.net>]

On 13/04/2009, at 1:36 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

> > For meaningful names:
> > 	Directly identifies the resource holder to any third party
>
> actually not.  note that, due to trademark rules
>   Randy's Inviting but Peculiar Epicurian
> can have the trade name RIPE which does not conflict with the one
> on singelstraat

Fair point. :-)


> > So, in this light I would urge the authors to remove all requirements
> > for ANY RPKI certs to be named, including the higher order RPKI  
> > certs.
>
> this change in the document certainly did not seem to have consensus  
> in
> the meeting, though sandy would be the one to judge that.

perhaps it can be brought up for consideration again now, on the list,  
and represented in Stockholm given that some clarification is now  
underway.

> > This leads me to the sidr-ta draft.
>
> wear a nose plug

I don't swim ;-)

Terry