Re: [sidr] GOST & SIDR

To: sidr at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] GOST & SIDR
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler+lists.sidr at watson.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:41:11 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-to: sidr at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904161158110.27241 at fledge.watson.org>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <D556D856-C2C3-4D60-BD8C-472619375DFB at tcb.net> <49DA347E.8010801 at burkov.aha.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904161158110.27241 at fledge.watson.org>
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Samuel Weiler wrote:

To me, the meaningful question is "can we handle algorithm agility"? By that,I mean "can we, for reasons not yet specified but including discovery ofweaknesses in some algorithms, cleaning introduce new algorithms"?

Make that "cleanly introduce new algorithms". I'm not have good luckwith the typing today.


-- Sam

References:
- [sidr] GOST & SIDR
  - From: Danny McPherson
- Re: [sidr] GOST & SIDR
  - From: Dmitry Burkov
- Re: [sidr] GOST & SIDR
  - From: Samuel Weiler

Prev by Date: Re: [sidr] Subject names wrt sidr-ta, sidr-arch
Next by Date: Re: [sidr] GOST & SIDR
Previous by thread: Re: [sidr] GOST & SIDR
Next by thread: Re: [sidr] GOST & SIDR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [sidr] GOST & SIDR

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.