Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt

[Terry Manderson <terry.manderson at icann.org>]

I support this document going forward.

the only comment I have is that I'd prefer to see a preference order in
validation (section 3) to help relying party S/W writers to make efficient
choices in the validation path - but that isn't a stopping block for me.

Cheers
Terry

On 28/10/09 12:48 PM, "Geoff Huston" <gih at apnic.net> wrote:

> The WG chairs have received a Working Group Last Call request from the
> authors of draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt.
> 
> The document (and the draft history) is at
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06
> 
> The Last Call will end as of the close of business on Monday 23rd
> November - this is a longer period than a conventional 2 week last
> call period in order to include the forthcoming SIDR WG meeting at
> IETF 76.
> 
> The intended status of this document is proposed standard.
> 
> As usual, please address all comments to the WG mailing list, and
> please be clear in your comments to this last call if you are
> supporting the document's submission to the IESG or if you are
> opposed, or if you are not expressing a view either way. As there are
> a number of documents that are being last-called at this point in time
> it would be appreciated if responses could clearly identify which
> document is being referred to.
> 
> Also with this note I would like to request the document's authors to
> prepare an interoperability report.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>    Geoff
> 
>   WG Co-CHair hat ON
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr