Re: [sidr] Request for Last Call on draft-ietf-sidr-rescerts-provisioning-05
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sidr] Request for Last Call on draft-ietf-sidr-rescerts-provisioning-05
> Would a global replace of "ISP" with "subject" and "IR" with "issuer"
> be a sufficient resolution of this discussion?
makes sense to me, especially in the two level case. when you get to
three or more, you may want grandchild/grandparent etc.
the key point is that it is turtles all the way down.
randy
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.