Re: [sidr] draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt as SIDR WG document
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sidr] draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt as SIDR WG document
I feel unable to say either way at present.
The IPR disclosure at https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1028/
highlights the US Patent Application Serial No. 12/243,767.
In searching for this, at the USPTO I cannot find any relevant documents
with that serial.
I did try searching for "Cisco" as the named party - but it returned far
more applications than I am willing to read through...
A direct link to the Patent Application would be appreciated!
Cheers
Terry
On 28/10/09 11:47 AM, "Sandra Murphy" <sandy at sparta.com> wrote:
>
>
> I am opening a two week wg call for comments on the adoption of this
> document as a working group item.
>
> This is a new version of the draft that was presented at the last IETF
> meeting (http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/75/slides/sidr-8.pdf). Potential
> adoption of the pfx-validate draft as a working group document was
> mentioned at that time.
>
> The document is available at:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt
>
> Please respond, either accept or not accept, by Tues Nov 3 2009.
>
> As usual, the rules are that silence does not indicate assent, so please
> actively reply.
>
> If you support adoption of this draft as a working group item, please also
> indicate whether you will be able to work on the draft (contribute
> or review).
>
> --Sandy
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Pradosh Mohapatra (pmohapat) wrote:
>
>> The authors would like to request that
>> draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt be adopted as a SIDR WG
>> document.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Pradosh
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> sidr at ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.