Re: [sidr] Request for WGLC

[Robert Loomans <robertl at apnic.net>]

Randy Bush wrote:
>> draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-03.txt
> 
> i object to last call on this.  there is a conflicting draft, and one
> not by a wg co-chair.

As I understand it the WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation should be
evaluated on the draft's own merits:

If there are specific conflicts between this and
draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate, could you please state what the
difference of opinion is.

If they simply cover the same ground, please say why the existing WG
draft is insufficient.

In either case, this would help clarify whether
draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation is sufficient as-is, needs nit fixes, or
more.

Thanks,
    Rob

-- 
Robert Loomans                         email:       robertl at apnic.net
Senior Software Engineer, APNIC        sip:    robertl at voip.apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net/                  phone:         +61 7 3858 3100