Re: [sidr] CP changes in response to WGLC comments
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sidr] CP changes in response to WGLC comments
On Nov 4, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
...
seems to me thatm if my parent goes out of business, the scramble is
to
build the peerings with the parent(s) to which my grandparent swings
the
resources from which my resources are drawn.
Correct; I agree that's the desired result, regardless of parent
failure.
My point is that 1 month is a very short time to implement potentially
significant operational changes from an updated CP, so unless there's
a reason for such a short time frame I'd recommend something longer.
/John
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.