Re: [sidr] CP changes in response to WGLC comments
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sidr] CP changes in response to WGLC comments



On Nov 4, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Randy Bush wrote:

...
seems to me thatm if my parent goes out of business, the scramble is to build the peerings with the parent(s) to which my grandparent swings the
resources from which my resources are drawn.

Correct; I agree that's the desired result, regardless of parent failure.

My point is that 1 month is a very short time to implement potentially significant operational changes from an updated CP, so unless there's a reason for such a short time frame I'd recommend something longer.

/John

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.