Re: [sidr] CP changes in response to WGLC comments

[Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>]

> My point is that 1 month is a very short time to implement potentially
> significant operational changes from an updated CP, so unless there's
> a reason for such a short time frame I'd recommend something longer.

but, in the real world, is cp-compliance a major criterion on which i
will move to/from a rpki provider?  i suspect it will be down in the
weeds, and reliability/reputation, price, ease of operation, ... will
predominate.

otoh, i can see that an rpki-provider might want longer than a month to
implement a new set of ops requirements.  but does not the current ietf
process provide years?

randy