Re: [sidr] CP changes in response to WGLC comments

[John Curran <jcurran at istaff.org>]

On Nov 4, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> ...
> but, in that case, is not the largest part of the problem still  
> getting
> the grandparent(s) to swing the covering resource set(s) to new
> parent(s)?  is not the cp-compliance issue but one very small part  
> of of
> the criteria on which i and my grandparent(s) choose new parent(s)?

Use case:

1) New CP comes out and specifies minimum standards in the area of  
Facility, Management, And Operational Controls (rather the delegation  
of such to the CPS)

2) Existing RPKI service providers need to assess this and decide  
implications therein

3) If existing RPKI providers can't/won't meet the requirements, and  
exit the business, they want to do so within 1 month due to 9.12.2 (to  
prevent having non-CP compliant certs out there)

You've got the time left over, after the RPKI service provider exits  
the field,  to scramble with the grandparent to select new service  
providers...

Hence, my suggestion that 30 days notice is rather short.
/John