Re: [sidr] CP changes in response to WGLC comments

[John Curran <jcurran at istaff.org>]

On Nov 4, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> otoh, i can see that an rpki-provider might want longer than a month  
> to
> implement a new set of ops requirements.  but does not the current  
> ietf
> process provide years?

You can't invest in the deployment of some types of requirements  
(liability, costs) until the need is certain, i.e. post approval.

Randy - Can you explain the concerns with having a longer time period  
in the document?

/John