Re: [sidr] CP changes in response to WGLC comments
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sidr] CP changes in response to WGLC comments
>> You've got the time left over, after the RPKI service provider exits
>> the field, to scramble with the grandparent to select new service
>> providers...
> if someone mid-chain turns off, certs/roas below will no longer
> validate. so swinging from the grandparent must be make before break.
following this line of thought, should an rpki provider be required to
give a significant re-parenting time window before stopping service?
randy
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.