Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt

[Terry Manderson <terry.manderson at icann.org>]

Matt,

In hindsight I think that any recommendations of ordering should exist in
some other document (akin to the one you alluded to in the thread on
sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle) which covers more operational aspects.

Cheers
Terry

On 6/11/09 6:46 AM, "Matt Lepinski" <mlepinski at bbn.com> wrote:

> Terry,
> 
> Can you elaborate on what you'd like to see in section 3 of the document?
> 
[..]
> 
> In any case, if the working group feels that there is a clear
> recommended processing order that we can provide in Section 3 that will
> increase the likelihood the implementors produce efficient software,
> then please send some text and I'd be happy to insert it.
> 
> - Matt Lepinski
>