Re: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle time

To: Matt Lepinski <mlepinski at bbn.com>, Sandra Murphy <sandy at sparta.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle time
From: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson at icann.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:54:45 -0800
Accept-language: en, en-US
Acceptlanguage: en, en-US
Cc: "sidr at ietf.org" <sidr at ietf.org>
Delivered-to: sidr at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <4AF330AC.7040809 at bbn.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcpeVFblBq0WMacXTQikNgsA9C6KJgAHwKl9
Thread-topic: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle time

Matt,

I think this is sensible.

Terry

On 6/11/09 6:08 AM, "Matt Lepinski" <mlepinski at bbn.com> wrote:

> 
>    "Note that since relying parties will perform these operations
>    regularly, it is more efficient for the relying party to request from
>    the repository system only those objects that have changed since the
>    relying party last updated its local cache. A relying party shall
>    choose the frequency with which it downloads and validates updates
>    from the repository system."
> 
>

References:
- Re: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle time
  - From: Matt Lepinski

Prev by Date: Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt
Next by Date: [sidr] IETF 76 SIDR WG Agenda
Previous by thread: Re: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle time
Next by thread: Re: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle time

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.