Re: [sidr] wg consideration of IPR

To: George Michaelson <ggm at apnic.net>
Subject: Re: [sidr] wg consideration of IPR
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:32:41 +0900
Cc: sidr at ietf.org
Delivered-to: sidr at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <FECB6B2B-835D-41FC-A197-90F2E9525FDE at apnic.net>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0911101150590.10528 at SANDYM-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <FECB6B2B-835D-41FC-A197-90F2E9525FDE at apnic.net>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

george,

if you think that the two drafts cover much the same technology, and you
accept the sad reality that sometimes technologies in the ietf suffer
ipr attacks, can you explain why are you angry that the same ipr attack
is directed at the two drafts you think are similar?

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [sidr] wg consideration of IPR
  - From: George Michaelson
- Re: [sidr] wg consideration of IPR
  - From: George Michaelson

References:
- [sidr] wg consideration of IPR
  - From: Sandra Murphy
- Re: [sidr] wg consideration of IPR
  - From: George Michaelson

Prev by Date: Re: [sidr] wg consideration of IPR
Next by Date: Re: [sidr] wg consideration of IPR
Previous by thread: Re: [sidr] wg consideration of IPR
Next by thread: Re: [sidr] wg consideration of IPR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [sidr] wg consideration of IPR

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.