Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document

To: Geoff Huston <gih at apnic.net>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document
From: Robert Loomans <robertl at apnic.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:19:13 +1000
Cc: Rob Austein <sra at isc.org>, sidr at ietf.org
Delivered-to: sidr at core3.amsl.com
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAMAAABg3Am1AAAAGFBMVEUbGxs1NTVVVVVycnKO jo6tra3MzMzg4OAC8PijAAACVElEQVR42pWVW3bjMAxDKT6U/e94AJBWXLcfHrRJpBhXoKjj2D7Q hqoyI8Jv4vTxTW6b4ZLOcD6do3XzA1g9qEKK0orGmeSuWGIHKCZE1KZkwgtA4oOzwjsMB4DRehID ULFgqc+ls49gwOami0xcwI41ipkfFRzWTWKlqZCi1ZpwRVRGQtHXG6gqRyHtN1tH1X0gMF0x+pPV 5fKs+/pSfh4yrh8AmvD11C9gM8CjQERgv+ds5/TiCWTSwYjKjc7kD8ViCT8AnzOBdppreyOOnSVc iLrkI/j3+g2E9fTItHjbEmVrcAfWmlFRTOhhJgImIUv/Uph57VmAS1+JWTt82brC8gCIHQub0yWl gAXAG5AGABGcBp0NdIs2zxjwXZGBVBIYUwL8DuhUhPEuOGePAAhllAUdAtzSMl0OgMANQAiIPXdZ GV6KKwCxMATBzaVTTOwISQCkDe6wORG91zVJARioOQK6Zzw3ekaV0gHKg0oCImKXr/wFxAMIAgrw rDAYngm9a/sCBbF3jojlDaj8KS8agGmA7jcAr8K1cXWHJmCAbIBT+Um4tekoES6dCgV4KxFBj86S IQcwdbkB/2pVyUQ7pOGpaLpaBI6i6IrZhLJcwCz1TFBEDDHt8gkIXTjAUYV6OgoBE6DsEKDnxgCW Kr7tNE0AgXtbPRrAxRi1p3TDzcEc4MjMco9ZjgTg8h/gKf465/d54GZXESr7DyD4a5vZ/m0vVE3I X/ZGG5oHiL3T/uCPcntPLBX0Hgh2y18DVf3AfQ/sD/U+IUoPKvsPLV/2p/4BtMMZxXNLW/wAAAAA SUVORK5CYII=
In-reply-to: <AF9E9439-B9CB-4713-96D7-7D9B962A95D3 at apnic.net>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Openpgp: id=C6B3AE7E; url=http://robert.loomans.org/0xC6B3AE7E.asc
Organization: APNIC - http://www.apnic.net/
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0911171910530.5096 at SANDYM-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <AF9E9439-B9CB-4713-96D7-7D9B962A95D3 at apnic.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20081105 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.18 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

Geoff Huston wrote:
> 2. In the context of the RPKI should the manifest document used a
> SHOULD to specify that the resources in the RPKI EE certificate used
> to validate the manifest's signature be specified using the inherit
> bit setting of the RFC3779 extensions?

I agree with this: A MUST would be too strong here; I believe that a
SHOULD is appropriate.

Rob

-- 
Robert Loomans                         email:       robertl at apnic.net
Senior Software Engineer, APNIC        sip:    robertl at voip.apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net/                  phone:         +61 7 3858 3100

References:
- [sidr] Question about manifest document
  - From: Geoff Huston

Prev by Date: Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document
Next by Date: Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document
Previous by thread: Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document
Next by thread: Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.