Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document

To: Stephen Kent <kent at bbn.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:41:15 +0900
Cc: sidr at ietf.org
Delivered-to: sidr at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <p06240811c72cbfac7715 at [192.168.1.3]>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0911171910530.5096 at SANDYM-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <AF9E9439-B9CB-4713-96D7-7D9B962A95D3 at apnic.net> <p06240811c72cbfac7715 at [192.168.1.3]>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> I agree that the manifest structure is more general than the RPKI
> context.

is that a problem for this wg?  i.e. should this, rather narrowly
focused wg, be doing this work.  we could miss a lot and step on others'
toes.

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document
  - From: Stephen Kent

References:
- [sidr] Question about manifest document
  - From: Geoff Huston
- Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document
  - From: Stephen Kent

Prev by Date: Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document
Next by Date: Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document
Previous by thread: Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document
Next by thread: Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.