Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document

[Stephen Kent <kent at bbn.com>]

At 9:41 AM +0900 11/21/09, Randy Bush wrote:
>  > I agree that the manifest structure is more general than the RPKI
> >  context.
>
> is that a problem for this wg?  i.e. should this, rather narrowly
> focused wg, be doing this work.  we could miss a lot and step on others'
> toes.
>
> randy

In principle I agree, but since the toes in question would be in PKIX, I
feel comfortable with a more generic version of manifests. Nonetheless,
if we pursue this path, I will bring the document to the attention of 
PKIX and ask that folks review it and comment during IETF LC.

Steve