Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document

[Stephen Kent <kent at bbn.com>]

At 11:49 PM +0900 11/21/09, Randy Bush wrote:
>  >>> I agree that the manifest structure is more general than the RPKI
> > > >   context.
> > >  is that a problem for this wg?  i.e. should this, rather narrowly
> > >  focused wg, be doing this work.  we could miss a lot and step on
> > >  others' toes.
> >  In principle I agree, but since the toes in question would be in PKIX, I
> >  feel comfortable with a more generic version of manifests. Nonetheless,
> >  if we pursue this path, I will bring the document to the attention of
> >  PKIX and ask that folks review it and comment during IETF LC.
>
> let me be less subtle
>
> it might be polite to run that plan by at least tim  and stefan
>
> randy

Thanks for the clarification.

Steve