Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-arch-09.txt

To: sidr at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-arch-09.txt
From: Rob Austein <sra at isc.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:25:56 -0500
Delivered-to: sidr at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <1CCB8133-6C27-480B-8A9A-196927F526C9 at apnic.net>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1CCB8133-6C27-480B-8A9A-196927F526C9 at apnic.net>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

I have read this draft, believe that (with one exception, below) it's
consistent with my implementation, and think it should go forward.

The one exception is section 4.3 on access protocol, already noted in
WG trac ticket #6.  Terry's right here, the draft is wrong, and the
authors have already agreed to fix it, so I have no further issue.

References:
- [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-arch-09.txt
  - From: Geoff Huston

Prev by Date: Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct-03.txt
Next by Date: Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document
Previous by thread: Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-arch-09.txt
Next by thread: Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-arch-09.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [sidr] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-sidr-arch-09.txt

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.