Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document

[Terry Manderson <terry.manderson at icann.org>]

On 25/11/09 6:31 AM, "Rob Austein" <sra at isc.org> wrote:

> Speaking as one of Geoff's co-authors, and with no intention of
> offending anyone: I would be ok with minor changes to the current doc
> that made it possible for others to reuse this work if they so desire,
> but I am not all that thrilled by the idea of pushing this work into
> the PKIX WG as a solution in search of additional problems, and I
> don't want to do anything to the current spec that would complicate
> RPKI use of it.

I'm in agreement with Rob on this. Best to not go looking for more problems
that the manifest _might_ fix in the future.

If such problems arise, then the PKIX chairs are clearly aware of this work
(noting Steve's response) and can advise accordingly.

Cheers
Terry