Re: [sidr] Question about manifest document

[Stephen Kent <kent at bbn.com>]

At 4:21 PM -0500 11/24/09, Sandra Murphy wrote:
> > ...
>
>
> Is there any reason why a more general/generic document could not be 
> produced later, with back references to the existing document as a 
> profile?

One might try to do that, although it would be procedurally "backwards" :-).

> That presumes of course that the generalization maintains backward 
> compatibility to the existing document.


Profiles are more specific, so the more general manifest would be a superset
of the RPKI manifest. Not sure if that would qualify as "backwards 
compatible" or not.

steve