Re: [sidr] #11: Nit Report - provisioning protocol
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sidr] #11: Nit Report - provisioning protocol
On 27/11/2009, at 6:20 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> and mis-attributed copies of email we have already read helps the
>>> technical work how?
>> I'm sorry if this caused any confusion to WG members. I copied a
>> message in to the issues tracker to ensure that it was captured in the
>> tracker, and the notification of the action is sent to the WG
>> mailer. There may be more tracker notices as I work through the
>> blacklog of WG last call comments that have been made on the mailing
>> list and attempt to capture them in the tracker.
>
> before i put this tracker thing in my .procmailrc, where's the win? the
> mailing list archive is broken?
>
The issue tracker was set up in response to requests on the WG mailer:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg01075.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg01076.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg01103.html
I understand that Sandy requested the tools team to set it up.
Geoff
WG co-chair hat ON
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.