Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC
"t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> Tue, 31 May 2011 17:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F84E086F for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.488, BAYES_50=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CVQbXVeGi8sY for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.btconnect.com (c2bthomr13.btconnect.com [213.123.20.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DB2E06D9 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host217-43-155-221.range217-43.btcentralplus.com (HELO pc6) ([217.43.155.221]) by c2bthomr13.btconnect.com with SMTP id DAP65700; Tue, 31 May 2011 18:43:40 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <021d01cc1fb1$a4429080$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>, sidr@ietf.org
References: <00fb01cc1c86$20345e00$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C49308788046D8@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 18:41:34 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0302.4DE528CB.00BD, actions=tag
X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/50, refid=2.7.2:2011.5.31.164218:17:7.586, ip=217.43.155.221, rules=__HAS_MSGID, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1, __SANE_MSGID, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, CT_TP_8859_1, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __SUBJECT_ENDING_IN_LATIN_OR_NUMERALS, BODY_SIZE_3000_3999, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __OUTLOOK_MUA, RDNS_SUSP, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr13.btconnect.com
X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B020B.4DE528CD.0184, ss=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=multiengine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
Subject: Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:43:48 -0000
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>; <sidr@ietf.org> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:58 PM > Tom, > > Thanks for your comment. > We have preliminary results that extend the RIB estimation (with BGPSEC) to > LISP (or, similar map-and-encap type of protocols). > That is, the scenario when LISP and BGPSEC are both in use. > I thought of sharing only the BGPSEC RIB modeling results for now. > Needless to say, in the scenario as you mention, > "outer routing headers for delivery to location, and inner routing headers for > delivery to the identified host", the RIB estimates for BGPSEC > would be much smaller for core PE routers or RRs. > > Any thoughts on what a realistic timeline might be for adoption of > LISP or ILNP (or any solution) for FIB scalability? > (Well, I hear you say - by the time the FIB size exceeds ~1M.) Ah, you are much more ahead of the game than I realised:-) I don't have any good data on LISP (or ILNP) except that I expect that eventually LISP will sweep all before it. It's a bit like IPv6; we are out of IPv4 addresses so IPv6 is a must so why can't I get an IPv6 service from any ISP whatsoever? So we run out of FIB space and noone does anything? seems likely:-(. Pick a figure from the air - 2020? Tom Petch > Sriram > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sidr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of t.petch > > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 11:53 AM > > To: sidr@ietf.org > > Subject: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC > > > > Try again ... > > and again ... > > > > RRG, before looking for some architectures that would solve the world's routing > > problems, did discuss the expected capacity of DFZ routers, given the expected > > rate of growth of technology, so as to work out how long the IETF has got to > > come up with something new. > > > > The consensus was that routers could not be expected to support more than 1M > > entries in the RIB which is somewhat less than the 2.7M you expect in 2025. > > And > > the new architecture could make the world look very different by then, with > > outer routing headers for delivery to location, and inner routing headers for > > delivery to the identified host. > > > > Tom Petch > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> > > > To: "sidr wg list" <sidr@ietf.org> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 2:28 PM > > > Subject: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC > > > > > > > > > In response to a request during Q&A at the SIDR WG meeting, April 1, in > > Prague, > > > I am posting the results of modeling and estimation of the RIB size for > > BGPSEC. > > > (I plan to present this work at the SIDR WG meeting in Quebec.) > > > > > > Here is the link for the slides: > > > > > > http://www.antd.nist.gov/~ksriram/BGPSEC_RIB_Estimation.pdf > > > { file:///D:/Articles/BGPSEC_RIB_Estimation.pdf } > > -- snip ---
- [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC Sriram, Kotikalapudi
- Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC t.petch
- [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC t.petch
- Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC Sriram, Kotikalapudi
- Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC Tony Li
- Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC Sriram, Kotikalapudi
- Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC Tony Li
- Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC t.petch
- Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC John Scudder
- Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] RIB Size Estimation for BGPSEC t.petch