[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Sigtran] Abort chunk bundled with data chunk

To: <sigtran at ietf.org>
Subject: [Sigtran] Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
From: "Salil Agrawal" <Salil.Agrawal at ccpu.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:37:35 +0530
Delivered-to: sigtran at core3.amsl.com
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sigtran>
List-help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <BDF44534797E3E46B55F3D12DE0C4BC40322075AD7 at GUREXMB01.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM><341a09720910090602t320e951ap38b853492c774920 at mail.gmail.com><BDF44534797E3E46B55F3D12DE0C4BC40322075DA4 at GUREXMB01.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM><20091009193525.GA375 at openss7.org><341a09720910112311s2ecb8da4qd93841cf201f20ae at mail.gmail.com> <BDF44534797E3E46B55F3D12DE0C4BC40322076004 at GUREXMB01.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM>
Thread-index: AcpLAs0y93RvKD37RjqqhpYWch4qmgAAWaggAJfLpAA=
Thread-topic: Abort chunk bundled with data chunk

Hi, 

We have a confusion while understanding the SCTP RFC4960 section 9.1 it
says "DATA chunks MUST NOT be bundled with ABORT" so sender must not
bundle the data with abort. 

But the second paragraph states that "An endpoint MUST NOT respond to
any received packet that contains an ABORT chunk". Which means if any
packet is received at the receiver end where ABORT is bundled with the
DATA it should not send any response. Does it mean that for the DATA
chunk SACK should not be generated? Please clarify.

Thanks,
Salil Agrawal

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Sigtran] Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
  - From: Ashwani Kathuria

References:
- [Sigtran] In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
  - From: Deepak Gunjal
- Re: [Sigtran] In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
  - From: Ashwani Kathuria
- Re: [Sigtran] In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receiving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
  - From: Deepak Gunjal
- Re: [Sigtran] In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receiving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
  - From: Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receiving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
  - From: Ashwani Kathuria
- Re: [Sigtran] In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receiving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
  - From: Deepak Gunjal

Prev by Date: Re: [Sigtran] In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receiving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
Next by Date: Re: [Sigtran] Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Previous by thread: Re: [Sigtran] In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receiving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
Next by thread: Re: [Sigtran] Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread