RE: [Simple] Inter-domain Requirements for SIMPLE

["Orit Levin" <oritl at microsoft.com>]

This requirement attempts to say:

A potential watcher asks a presentity to grant access to presentity's
presence information, but the watcher (or more precisely, its PS) is not
interested in the presence information being pushed on individual basis
from this point on. In other words, it can be implemented by just adding
the watcher to presentity's ACL. Or in case of groups, adding the
requesting watcher to a specific group.

Orit.

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rsparks@dynamicsoft.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 8:48 AM
To: Orit Levin
Cc: IETF SIMPLE WG; Avshalom Houri
Subject: Re: [Simple] Inter-domain Requirements for SIMPLE

Orit, Avshalom -

Thanks for submitting this draft. You've captured some
important thoughts around deploying presence systems that
deserve attention. I particularly look forward to the
discussions we'll have around section 7.3 (Grouping of
Watchers for SHARING of Presence Info).

One quick question: I don't understand what you're looking
for with the first requirement of 7.1:

   o  Presence access: It MUST be possible to request continuous
      access to the status of a remote presentity without
      "subscribing" to it.

Could you explain this a little more?

RjS

On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 17:33, Orit Levin wrote:
> Guys!
> We have submitted a requirements document for secure and efficient
> transfer of presence information over inter-domain links.
> Please, take a look at our thoughts and suggestions:
>  
>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-levin-simple-interdomain-reqs-
00.txt
>  
> We look forward to your feedbacks on how we can enhance SIMPLE to
> support these directions.
>  
> Thanks,
> Orit.


_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple