Re: [Simple] Address and person URIs

[Ted Hardie <hardie at qualcomm.com>]

At 2:20 PM -0400 7/21/04, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> > I'm fine to punt, but I think this is a case where the perfect is a 
> > serious enemy of the good.
> >
> > I think that a service URI of the form:
> >
> > uri:inperson
> >
> > is sufficient, without any additional per-user data. We can leave 
> > it to the human to figure out how to resolve the URI. Indeed, the 
> > presentity placetype (home, work, etc.) would probably suffice, 
> > since  a watcher can ususally infer how to find them within that 
> > place. We just need a way to say, "come talk to me". Does that 
> > cover EVERY case? No way. Does it cover many of the important ones? 
> > Yes.
>
> I am fine with that, although it may be difficult to register such a 
> uri scheme.
>
> 	Paul

I would certainly suggest running it by the uri mailing list as soon
as you can.  But a worked description of the scheme might be
needed before you do that, as a bare proposal of "what about an
inperson scheme?" seems likely to attract ideas far different from those
the working group has in mind.
				regards,
					Ted Hardie

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple