I think the relationship between the latest RPID document and the presence data model document is a little unclear. In RPID, it says that the "<activities> element describes what the presentity is currently doing, expressed as an enumeration of <activity> elements". I think this clearly belongs to the <person> element in the presence data model. In the examples in the RPID draft, the activities element is applied to service tuples. Maybe it should be mentioned that these should be used on the <person> element? Wouldn't it be a good idea to include the definitions of <person> and <device> in the RPID draft? /Dag -----Original Message----- From: Henning Schulzrinne [mailto:hgs at cs.columbia.edu] Sent: den 9 oktober 2004 22:04 To: Simple WG Subject: [Simple] Updated RPID I will shortly submit http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/draft/rpid/draft-ietf-simple-rpid-04.html Please let me know if I failed to incorporate conclusions of the recent discussion. The major changes are the removal of tuple-type element, the re-naming and more precise syntax of the <idle> element (now, <user-input>) and the addition of a <timezone> element. The data model draft is cited. Henning _______________________________________________ Simple mailing list Simple at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Simple mailing list Simple at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple