Re: MSRP: Are REPORTs per-chunk or per-message? (was Re: [Simple] Review of draft-ietf-simple-message-sessions-08 - Byte Ranges in REPORTs)

[Ben Campbell <ben at nostrum.com>]

On Oct 8, 2004, at 12:06 PM, Aki Niemi wrote:

> On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 19:44, ext Cullen Jennings wrote:
>
> > If one of the relays has more than one TCP connection to the next 
> > relay, the
> > chunk on one of these path's may get ahead of the chunk on the other 
> > path.
>
> I have to say I hate this. I've also never seen a requirement for the
> ability to demux messages from a single connection onto man 
> connections.
> Can you help me understand where this requirement is coming from?

I think the real problem is not that we want to go out of our way to 
enable such behavior, but do not want to add the complexity necessary 
to ensure it never happens. I can think of some failure-recovery 
conditions that might cause out-of-order delivery.


> Cheers,
> Aki
>
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> Simple at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple


_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple