[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Simple] Presence Authorization Discussion B: Composition/Aut h Sequencing
Hello,
I would agree on the order of first composition and then authorization in
the case that composition would be watcher independent.
But in light of the discussion of watcher dependent composition I would
favor the other way around (first authorization and the composition).
Because, does it make sense to do a watcher dependent composition and spent
time and processing power on it, to find out later that you will block this
watcher.
Greetings,
Stefan.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: simple-bounces at ietf.org
> [mailto:simple-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rosenberg
> Sent: maandag 11 oktober 2004 9:43
> To: Simple WG
> Subject: [Simple] Presence Authorization Discussion B:
> Composition/Auth Sequencing
>
>
> We had a lot of list discussion at some point about whether
> composition
> came first or whether authorization came first, and about
> where the line
> between one ended and the next began.
>
> I think this is much clearer now in light of the data model,
> which very
> explicitly separates the roles of composition (correlation, conflict
> resolution, merging and splitting) and privacy filtering based on
> authorization rules. The former happens first. Indeed, I
> think the data
> model gives us a good grounding to start a discussion later on about
> what we might want composition policy documents to look like.
> But lets
> hold that off until we finish our basic work.
>
> Thanks,
> Jonathan R.
> --
> Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 600 Lanidex Plaza
> Chief Technology Officer Parsippany, NJ 07054-2711
> dynamicsoft
> jdrosen at dynamicsoft.com FAX: (973) 952-5050
> http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000
> http://www.dynamicsoft.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> Simple at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
>
_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple