[Simple] Re: [Geopriv] Re: IRI-URI XCAP

[Henning Schulzrinne <hgs at cs.columbia.edu>]

This is a slightly different topic, but there are indications that  
SIP URIs can indeed be treated as IRIs, without explicit definition,  
at least from my reading of the IRI spec. We should discuss this with  
the IRI authors, as it would avoid having to solve the problem later.

On Nov 18, 2005, at 6:23 PM, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:


> Adding geopriv since this is a common issue.
>
> It depends on whether the scheme itself supports IRI. For SIP, it  
> doesn't, so the xcap server wouldn't do any conversion. For schemes  
> that support IRI, the common policy draft does need to say which  
> format the IRI is stored in. We are having similar discussions  
> around domain names and IDNs. We should probably be consistent.
>
> -Jonathan R.


_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple