Re: [Simple] problem with filters and resource lists

[Hisham Khartabil <hisham.khartabil at telio.no>]

I guess you are referring to the following text:

"If the URI indicated by the filter is for one resource whose URI is
   NOT under the RLS administrative control, the RLS propagates the
   filter to all the fanned out subscriptions sent to destinations
   outside the administrative domain of the RLS."

This seems to have the limitation you mention below.

Would the following text fix it? would it break anything else?

"If the URI indicated by the filter is for one resource whose URI is
   NOT under the RLS administrative control, the RLS propagates the
   filter to all the fanned out."


Hisham

On Feb 10, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Silvestr.Peknik at tietoenator.com wrote:

> Hello,
>
> In draft-ietf-simple-event-filter-funct par. 4.1. is described how rls 
> server handles filters in subscription to resource list. Following 
> situation is not clear to me:
>
> I have 2 lists in one RLS (name it RLS1):
> 	list1 at example.com (bob at example.com, list2 at example.com)
> 	list2 at example.com (alice at biloxi.com, sarah at example.com)
>
> Then I have subscribe with filter:
>
> SUBSCRIBE sip:list1 at example.com SIP/2.0
>    ...
>    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>    <filter-set xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter">
>      <filter id="999" uri="sip:sarah at example.com">
> 	...
>      </filter>
>      <filter id="8439" uri="sip:alice at biloxi.com">
> 	...
>      </filter>
>    </filter-set>
>
> My current understanding is that the filter for alice will NOT be 
> propagated and will be lost, because:
> 1/ it will not be propagated in the subscribe to list2, because list2 
> is under administrative control of RLS1.
> 2/ it will not be applied by the RLS1, because it is not under it's 
> administrative control
>
> This is similar to the example in the draft, but in the draft the 
> lists are in different RLSs - therefore the filter for alice is 
> propagated in the subscribe to list2.
>
> This seems like an error to me, because the result is different for 2 
> lists in the same RLSs and in 2 different RLSs.
>
> Can someone explain this?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Silvestr Peknik
> Software Specialist
>
> TietoEnator
> Czech Software Center
> Phone +420 599 096 027
> E-mail silvestr.peknik at tietoenator.com  
>  
> Vystavni 292/13
> CZ-709 16 Ostrava
>  
> www.tietoenator.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> Simple at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple


_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple