Re: [Simple] 501 Not Implemented considered harmful in MSRP

[Cullen Jennings <fluffy at cisco.com>]

I guess I could go either way on this - I probably need to think about it
more. More information about what went wrong is often better.

On 2/4/06 7:32 AM, "Jussi K. Virtanen" <jussi.k.virtanen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> MSRP defines the status code 501 Not Implemented to be sent as a
> response to a request with unknown request method. I propose that
> the status code is removed and the status code 400 Bad Request is
> used instead.

> 
> The existence of 501 Not Implemented implies that it is acceptable
> to introduce new capabilities (in this case, a new request method)
> to a session outside an offer--answer exchange. As far as I can see,
> this is in conflict with established conventions in SIP and SDP.


> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> --
> Jussi K. Virtanen
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> Simple at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple